- The Complete Research Material is averagely 50 pages long and it is in Ms Word Format, it has 1-5 Chapters.
- Major Attributes are Abstract, All Chapters, Figures, Appendix, References.
- Study Level: BTech, BSc, BEng, BA, HND, ND or NCE.
- Full Access Fee: ₦6,000
Get the complete project »
The study examines the private sector as the engine of economic growth and development in Nigeria. A model was specified and data were collected from the period of 1980-2010. The method used in this research work is the ordinary least square (OLS) regression model and variables which are: gross domestic product (GDP) as the dependent variable while foreign private investment (FPI), domestic private investment (DPI), total private savings (TPS), and total bank loans (TBL) are the independent variables and are all significant except total private savings that is insignificant. From the regression result, the following findings were made The estimate coefficients which are 0.8999687 {FPI} shows that a 1 percent increase in foreign private investment will cause 89.9 per cent increase in GDP, 0.0851059 {DPI} shows that a 1 percent increase in domestic private investment will cause an 8.5 per cent increase in GDP, 0.2444129 {TBL} shows that a 1 percent increase in total bank loans will cause 24 per cent increase in GDP. -0.0268498 {TPS} shows that a 1 percent increase in total private savings will cause 2.6 per cent decrease in GDP.. I recommend that there should be policies that will attract foreign investors; such policies could be the reduction of corporate tax rate. Incentives should be given to local investors to enable them compete with foreign investors world-wide. Policies also should be made against the transfer of capital and profit from Nigeria to foreign countries as it drains the income meant for national development. The government should also maintain political stability in the economy because unstable environment discourages investors.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of The Study
Privatization has become a major strategy adopted world over to improve
the performance of public enterprises. It is a known fact that one
feature of public enterprises all over the world but more importantly in
developing countries of Africa especially Nigeria is inefficiency,
bureaucracy of public enterprises and uncared attitude of most public
servants or most people to public work and property. This leads to
waste, slow growth and inordinate dependence on government support (in
the form of annual subventions) even when the activity is apparently a
profitable line.
As a way of improving the fortunes and performance of these enterprises
through which profit orientation will be the motive of the enterprises,
privatization is being canvassed such that government will divest itself
of all its ownership interest and allow
12
private sector to buy over these companies. In Nigeria today, the
private sector is increasingly being recognized as the motivating force
that fosters economic progress.
In Nigeria, the oil boom of the1970s among other factors gave impetus to
a public sector-led government strategy. Public sector dominance was
also prevalent in order to give government an increasing measure of
control over its own resources (obadan 2000), the dwindling revenue of
government as a result of the economic crisis of the 1980s coupled with
the dissatisfaction with the performance of the public compelled Nigeria
to adopt the privatization and commercialization in 1988.
Today, in Nigeria, privatization of key government business is no longer
a household talk but it has become a major issue in the mind of every
meaningful Nigerian.
The participation of the State in enterprises in Nigeria dates back to
the colonial era. The task of providing basic infrastructure such as
railway, road, bridges, water, electricity and port facilities fell on
the colonial government due to the absences of indigenous
13
companies with the required capital as well as the inability or
unwillingness of foreign trading companies to embark on capital
intensive project (Iheme, 1997). The involvement was expended and
consolidated by the colonial welfare development plan (1946-1956) that
was formulated when labor party came to power in the United Kingdom.
This trend continued after independence such that by 1999, it was
estimated that successive Nigerian government had invested up to N800
billion in public owned enterprises (Igbuzor, 2003 as citing Obasanjo,
1999). Throughout much of the twentieth century, there were three
dominant strategies for infrastructure investment. In some countries,
most notably those in the Eastern Bloc, State ownership of the means of
production was promoted, while others (Western Bloc) promoted private
ownership of production. A large number of countries also predicted what
was termed a mixed economy, a combination of public and private
ownership of the means of production. However, by the end of the
twentieth century with the end of cold war between the eastern and
western bloc, private ownership of the means of production gained
ascendancy. Today, what is applicable is that the State should recede
from this role, and that private ownership of the means of production is
the only viable approach to the efficient production of goods and
services, as well as economic growth and development. Consequently,
there is a strong move all over the world to privatize erstwhile public
enterprises (Igbuzor, 2003). Thus, privatization could be looked upon as
the reduction of public sector intervention in economic activity. It
involves the divesture of government economic activities (Anyanwu,
1993). It occupies a unique position in a global economic liberation and
provides an avenue for raising productivity, thus, enhancing overall
economic growth and development (Salako, 1999). This is however,
achieved through increased involvement of the private sector in
productive economic activities through the sale of public enterprises to
the private sector with the ultimate aim of infusing improved economic
efficiency in the businesses. With privatization, the role of government
in direct productive activities diminishes as the private sector takes
over such responsibilities with profit motive as its major objective. In
such a situation, the government is only expected to provide essential
infrastructure and an enabling environment through which private
enterprises could flourish. Privatization is predicated on the
assumptions of State inefficiency and absolute efficiency of the market
(Salako, 1999). It would be recalled that several Nigerian public
enterprises have on several occasions been under severe criticism by
international media agents for their operational and pricing
inefficiencies. Nigeria like many other developing economies witnessed
increasing cost and poor performance of State-owned enterprises (SOEs),
resulting in heavy financial losses. In it, there has been proliferation
of SOEs in all facets of economic endeavours, as a means of fostering
rapid economic growth and development (Eke, 2000).
Unfortunately, most of them were structurally ill-conceived,
economically inefficient with accumulated huge financial losses and thus
absorbing disproportionate share of domestic credit. They were also
sustained through heavy budgetary allocations of the country (Jerome,
1996, as cited in Eke, 2000). For instance, the state-owned enterprises
(SOEs) are adjudged to have contributed substantially to public sector
deficit and have financed less than one fifth of their investments
through Internally Generated
Resources (IGR) (Nair and Filippides, 1988). As some governments ran
into severe fiscal problems such that loans became increasingly
difficult to rise at home and abroad, they were forced to consider some
radical methods of reviving the SOEs. Such reforms embarked upon by
developing countries included privatization. Kikeri (1994) has noted
that the high costs and poor performance of SOEs and the modest and
fleeting results of reform efforts have turned many governments towards
privatization.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
It is the inefficiency of government-run public enterprises today that
calls for the privatization of these enterprises. However one may note
that privatization may not likely be the only solution of getting
government-run enterprises on the ideal path of efficiency, deregulation
and market oriented economy. The study therefore believes that there
should be some silent initiatives that if properly harnessed could be
the shining light to lead the nation’s ship to the desired harbor.
1.3 Research Questions
1. Is privatization the engine of economic growth in Nigeria?
2. Is there any relationship between privatization and economic growth?
1.4 Objectives Of The Study
1. To determine the relationship between private sector spending and GDP.
2. To ascertain the relationship between public sector spending and GDP.
3. To find out whether there is any relationship between public and private sector spending and GDP.
1.5 Research Hypothesis
Privatization does not have impact on economic growth in Nigeria.
1.6 Significance Of The Study
1. To provide information on the privatization of the Nigerian privatization exercise.
2. To determine whether privatization has contributed positively or
negatively to the growth and development of the Nigerian economy.
3. To educate students about the nature of the Nigerian private sector.
1.7 Scope Of The Study
The study covers the impact of the private sector from 1980-2010.
1.8 Definition Of Basic Concept
PRIVATISATION: This is the process of transferring ownership interest
and control in a government-owned enterprise to the private sector.
FULL PRIVATISATION: The government sells the enterprise in full to private individuals or groups.
PARTIAL PRIVATISATION: The government sells some of its shares or holdings to the private sector.
PUBLIC SECTOR: They are organizations that are owned and managed by the government.
PRIVATE SECTOR: This consists of private business ownership.
You either get what you want or your money back. T&C Apply
You can find more project topics easily, just search
-
SIMILAR ECONOMICS FINAL YEAR PROJECT RESEARCH TOPICS
-
1. GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION PROGRAMME AS A TOOL FOR REDUCTION OF YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT IN KADUNA STATE:THECASE OF SURE-P 2012-2018.
» ABSTRACTs The study examines government intervention programme as a tool for reducing youth unemployment in Kaduna State using descriptive statistics ...Continue Reading »Item Type & Format: Project Material - Ms Word | 92 pages | Instant Download | Chapter 1-5 | ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT
-
2. IMPACT OF MICRO CREDIT ON POVERTY ALLEVIATION SCHEME IN EDO STATE A CASE STUDY OF LIFT ABOVE POVERTY ORGANIZATION (LAPO)
» ABSTRACT The level of poverty in Nigeria since the implementation of the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) is on the increase despite several meas...Continue Reading »Item Type & Format: Project Material - Ms Word | 52 pages | Instant Download | Chapter 1-5 | ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT
-
3. GLOBALIZATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA: AN ASSESSMENT
» CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY A brief look at Nigeria today one can find out that we like fashion and everything new in Nigeria, th...Continue Reading »Item Type & Format: Project Material - Ms Word | 77 pages | Instant Download | Chapter 1-5 | ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT
-
4. AN ASSESSMENT OF CORRUPTION AND UNDERDEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA (A CASE STUDY OF HALLIBURTON)
» CHAPTER ONE GENERAL INTRODUCTION Background of the Study A man can be born again; the springs of life can be cleansed instantly…if this is true of o...Continue Reading »Item Type & Format: Project Material - Ms Word | 141 pages | Instant Download | Chapter 1-5 | ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT
-
5. IMPACT OF COMMERCIAL BANKS ON SMALL AND MEDIUM SCALE ENTERPRISES DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA
» CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the study Small and medium scaled businesses (SME) are businesses whose personnel numbers fall below certai...Continue Reading »Item Type & Format: Project Material - Ms Word | 52 pages | Instant Download | Chapter 1-5 | ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT
-
6. THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT ON ECONOMIC GROWTH OF NIGERIA FROM 1980-2013.
» CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION Background to the Study The theoretical argument that supports the link between financial development and growth is that a we...Continue Reading »Item Type & Format: Project Material - Ms Word | 52 pages | Instant Download | Chapter 1-5 | ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT
-
7. PROXIMATE DETERMINANTS: THE PATHWAYS OF INFLUENCE OF UNDERLYING FACTORS ON UNDER-FIVE MORTALITY IN NIGERIA
» Abstract Nigeria is a country with one of the world’s highest rate of under five mortality. Any innovative research aimed at bringing solutions ...Continue Reading »Item Type & Format: Project Material - Ms Word | 143 pages | Instant Download | Chapter 1-5 | ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT
-
8. THE EFFECT OF URBANIZATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT ON THE NIGERIAN ECONOMY
» CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY The rate of urbanization is increasing in both the developed and developing countries. However, r...Continue Reading »Item Type & Format: Project Material - Ms Word | 89 pages | Instant Download | Chapter 1-5 | ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT
-
9. THE IMPACT OF BANK FAILURE IN NIGERIA ECONOMY (A CASE STUDY OF SAVANNAH BANK OF NIGERIA PLC)
» ABSTRACT The aim of this research study is to analyze and ascertain the extent to which fraud and poor management contributed to bank failure through ...Continue Reading »Item Type & Format: Project Material - Ms Word | 124 pages | Instant Download | Chapter 1-5 | ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT
-
10. MICROFINANCE AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION: A CASE STUDY OF AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY MICROFINANCE BANK (A.B.U. MFB) , ZARIA.
» ABSTRACT Poverty has such an adverse effect that those under it remain trapped in a vicious circle because access to basic necessities of life is lack...Continue Reading »Item Type & Format: Project Material - Ms Word | 94 pages | Instant Download | Chapter 1-5 | ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT