Get the complete project »
- The Complete Research Material is averagely 115 pages long and it is in Ms Word Format, it has 1-5 Chapters.
- Major Attributes are Abstract, All Chapters, Figures, Appendix, References.
- Study Level: BTech, BSc, BEng, BA, HND, ND or NCE.
- Full Access Fee: ₦4,000
Following widespread acceptance by researchers that the effects of qualitative/managerial construction time-influencing factors need to be considered in project scope-based construction time predicting models, several multivariate models combining project scope and qualitative/managerial factors have been developed. However, it has been shown in literature that the applicability of these models is clearly limited to the regions/countries where they were developed. This study was therefore aimed at developing a multivariate construction time predicting model that will be applicable to the Nigeria construction industry. A self-administered questionnaire survey was used to source information on the quantitative (project scope) factors considered in the study as well as to assess the extent of influence of the qualitative factors on construction time. Principal component regression was used for the data analysis and model development, using SPSS 16.0 for windows. Following a non-normal distribution of errors and a low R2 value obtained when multiple linear regression analysis was first conducted, the study’s data set was double log transformed and then partitioned/reclassified to account for public and private sector projects. Three models were developed following the multiple linear regression analysis repeated after transforming and partitioning/reclassifying the study’s data set. Two of these models (the public sector model and the private sector model) had high R2 values and were found after testing and validation, to be suitable for predicting construction time, while one of the models (the all projects model) had a low R2 value and was consequently found to be unsuitable for predicting construction time. The models with high R2values serve as a useful
tool to project managers and contractors for predicting construction time, thereby facilitating effective planning.
1.1 Background to the study
The importance of ensuring accuracy and reliability of construction time estimates at the tendering stage cannot be overemphasized. Accurate early estimates of construction time typically provides clients and contractors with a basis for evaluating the success of a project and the efficiency of the project organisation (Nkado, 1995). They also provide them with a basis for ascertaining logistical and cash flow implications for feasibility, budgeting, planning, monitoring and even litigation purposes (Skitmore and Ng, 2003). Furthermore, they serve as a criteria in determining the best combination when performing time-cost optimization (Que, 2002). It is therefore clear that construction time has become a vital tool used by clients and contractors to ensure the success of construction projects. This success will however, only be achieved when construction time is accurately predicted.
Construction time/periods are often calculated on the basis of the planner’s own previous experience on similar projects (Choudhury and Phatak, 2004). However, as pointed out by Skitmore and Ng (2003), the need to reduce the problem of subjectivity associated with the planner’s experience and judgement to correctly interpret project and site information and make the best possible decisions, has long resulted in the development of construction time predicting models.
The development of construction time predicting models commenced with the use of project scope factors. Project scope is a measure of project size, which can be described as construction cost, project duration, gross floor area, number of storey, building type and procurement method (Walker, 1995).
The fact that the development of construction time predicting models commenced with the use of project scope factors, can clearly be seen in the time-cost model originally developed by Bromilow (1969). It is also evident in the validation of Bromilow (1969) model by other researchers e.g. in Australia (Ireland, 1983; Yeong, 1994; Ng et al., 2001), in the UK (Kaka and Price, 1991), in Hong Kong (Chan, 1999), in Nigeria (Ojo, 2001; Ogunsemi and Jagboro, 2006), in Korea (Long and Young, 2009), as well as in Ghana (Ameyaw et al., 2012). Efforts to improve the Bromilow (1969) model are also clear indications that the development of construction time predicting models commenced with the use of project scope factors, e.g. Chan and Kumaraswamy (1995) combined cost and gross floor area (GFA) to model construction time; Love et al. (2005) on the basis that cost is a poor predictor of construction time since the final cost is not known at the initial stages of a project, modelled construction time using GFA and number of storey; Chen and Huang (2006) in a bid to finding a way to quickly estimate the duration and cost of reconstruction projects in the early planning phase where detailed information is not available, modelled construction time using cost and number of floors.
Project scope based models were found good for predicting construction time, however, as researchers (e.g.; Walker, 1995; Chan, 1999; Ng et al., 2001) rightly observed, they lacked the inclusion of several other non-project scope (qualitative) factors which influence construction time. Walker (1995) specifically noted that the principal criticism of project scope based models is that the management process is too complex to be relegated to the value of a constant conveniently described in a formula, regardless of the correctness of the statistical methodology used. It is on this basis that a recommendation for further research was generally been made by the aforementioned research works, for the identification of those other non-project scope (qualitative) factors which influence
construction time, and the full incorporation of their coefficients and weightings into a model for predicting construction time.
Several researches have been carried out to identify other non-project scope (qualitative) factors which influence construction time, some of which include the works of Ireland (1985), Walker (1995), Nkado (1995), Koushiki et al. (2005) as well as Olupolola et al.
(2010). Research works have also been conducted to develop multivariate construction time predicting models combining project scope and other qualitative construction time influencing factors together (e.g., Chan and Chan (2002) developed a multivariate model for public housing projects in Hong Kong; Hoffman et al. (2007) also developed a multivariate model for facility projects funded by the US air force).
However, because there is little consensus as to which combination of the qualitative construction time influencing factors provide an accurate predictor of construction duration (Nkado, 1999) and inaccuracies may result when regression models are used to extrapolate or predict values of the dependent variable for independent variables which are outside the population for which the original model was developed (McClave et al., 2000), it is obvious that existing multivariate models are only applicable in the regions/countries where they were developed.
1.2 Statement of the problem
Project scope based construction time predicting model has been developed for Nigeria by Ogunsemi and Jagboro (2006). However, the research work of Olupolola et al. (2010) which revealed 23 key factors as having stronger effect on the time performance of building projects in Nigeria, is an indication that just like other project scope based construction time predicting models developed across the world, the time-cost model
developed by Ogunsemi and Jagboro (2006) falls short of other factors that influence construction time (in Nigeria).
Nigeria is therefore faced with the question of how these other factors can be combined with project scope factors to predict construction time, since despite the fact that multivariate models have been developed in some parts of the world they cannot be used in Nigeria because as Nkado (1995) rightly observed, there is little consensus as to which combination of these more qualitative factors provides an accurate predictor of construction duration. In addition, McClave et al. (2000) has noted that inaccuracies may result when regression models are used to extrapolate or predict values of the dependent variable for independent variables which are outside the population for which the original model was developed.1.3 Aim and Objectives
1.3.1 Aim of the research
To develop a multivariate construction time predicting model for Nigeria.
The objectives through which the above stated aim was achieved were as follows:
i. To evaluate the project scope factors influencing construction time of building projects.
ii. To assess the qualitative factors influencing durations of building projects.
iii. To develop the model.
iv. To test the model.
1.4 Justification for the Study
Modelling building construction durations in Nigeria will provide Nigeria with a construction time predicting model which incorporates both project scope factors and managerial/qualitative construction time influencing factors together. This will serve as a means to ensure more accurate and realistic predictions of construction time as all construction time influencing factors will be taken into consideration any time the model is used to make predictions.
Consultancy firms and contractor organizations will therefore have the opportunity to make more realistic schedules and benchmark measures of construction period, thereby facilitating effective planning.
1.5 Scope and Limitations
1.5.1 Scope of the study
Building construction projects of a contract sum not less than ten million naira, completed via the traditional procurement route, between the years 2007-2012 were considered for this research. The range of years (2007-2012) and the choice of projects having a contract sum not less than ten million naira, was to ensure that the most recent trend within the construction industry is captured. As it was not possible to cover the whole Nigeria in the study, only Abuja (FCT), Kaduna and Kano states of Nigeria were covered by the study. These states were selected because they were considered to be among some of Nigeria’s most developed states, with a relatively high concentration of construction firms in them.
i. The usefulness of the models developed in this study is limited to the accuracy of the data provided by respondents in the self-administered questionnaire survey.
ii. As with any prediction model, prediction is only valid within the range of characteristics of the selected sample data. For this reason, the use of the models developed in this study, is limited to projects that meet the characteristics of the sample used for the model development i.e. public and private sector building projects of a contract sum not less than 10 million naira, completed via the traditional procurement route.
iii. Cost, GFA and number of floors were the only quantitative/project scope factors considered in the study. The developed models therefore do not account for any variation in duration which may arise from other project scope factors such as location, procurement route and type of contract.
You either get what you want or your money back. T&C Apply
You can find more project topics easily, just search
SIMILAR PROJECT MANAGEMENT FINAL YEAR PROJECT RESEARCH TOPICS
1. ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) PROCUREMENT MODEL FOR INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA» ABSTRACT Several researchers have identified the importance of managing stakeholders as major criteria for determining project success. Project succes...Continue Reading »
» CHAPTER ONE 1.0 Introduction It is quite obvious that every organization keeps materials which form one of the pivotal elements in the organization. A...Continue Reading »
3. A GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION USING SEISMIC REFRACTION METHOD TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE(S) OF ROAD FAILURE» CHAPTER ONE MEANING AND BASIC APPLICATION OF GEOPHYSICS 1.1 INTRODUCTION It is to be noted that the geophysical method of prospecting and delineation ...Continue Reading »
» MANAGING PROJECT RISK IN A PERIOD OF ECONOMIC RECESSION IN NIGERIA 1.0 INTRODUCTION It is trite knowledge that organizations exist for a purpose; eith...Continue Reading »
» Chapter one Introduction 1.1. Background of the Study Construction industry has complexity in its nature because it contains a large number of parties...Continue Reading »
6. EXPLORING OPTIONS FOR IMPROVING LIVELIHOODS AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN NIGERIA COASTAL COMMUNITIES» CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY Nigeria is endowed with a long coastline of about 960km, a large area of inshore waters, and a va...Continue Reading »
» CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY It is a known fact that the Nigerian construction industry continues to occupy an important posit...Continue Reading »
» CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY When asked to define "design error," not all disciplines in the construction process ag...Continue Reading »
9. APPRAISAL OF STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT PRACTICE IN TERTIARY EDUCATION TRUST FUND (TETFUND) CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS» ABSTRACT Several researchers have identified the importance of managing stakeholders as major criteria for determining project success. Project succes...Continue Reading »
10. PROJECT COST CONTROL IN THE NIGERIAN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY (A CASE STUDY OF EL-ALAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (NIGERIA) LIMITED)» CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION Background of the study Project cost controls in the Nigerian construction sector have always been under studied. On the cour...Continue Reading »